Sunday, July 22, 2007
Paramount list of movies to now download
Plus, Fuck. What the hell. I pay 49.99$ a month and then Paramount sees me downloading one of their movies and they want to make me feel afraid. Fuck you paramount. If you don't want people to see your movie, don't put it on the net. I pay for the net. Shub it up your ass and let people to pay to get in to watch it there. How do you spell Shub, there should be a movie up someone's ass about that. I would pay to get in.
But I do pay that much. 599.880000000 a year to have Internet. If I emailed someone once a day, that would be 1.62 dollars per mail. after 17.65 emails, it would have been the 29cents of postage that we pay today. Who the fuck wants to do that?? send 18 pieces of mail every single fucking day through he post office. They would travel for days before getting where my email version would get in less than a second.
It is clear that we Internet Fucks are not here for the fucking email. Cox, 49.99 is for entertainment. We want to talk to friends, email them, chat with them, listen through IP phony apps and radio stations on the net. We want the information on the net to be free. If you Paramount don't want that, and instead want me to pay for the movie, you got to make the internet private rather than public. If the net was yours, and I was on it for free then the 49.99 would go to pay for individual pieces of entertainment.
But the net is not free to get on, so get your fucking movies off of it. If you can control where your movies go, that means you own every copy. If you don't, that means they are up for grabs. Don't come to me asking me to "unsee" a movie, I just can't do that. I hope I have the right to remember a song in my head, because if not, then I would be infringing copy rights. We are after all computer programs our selves. Very complicated ones probably. But that doesn't make me able to "unsee" a movie I saw. If I find it on the net, its is mine unless you can protect it. If your movie is in a store, behind a glass, that means it is illegal for me to break the window and run away with it. I'm not hacking on to computers, I'm getting stuff from the floor. Stuff on the street is free as it is stuff on the net. Anything your computer can freely get to is yours to take. If that doesn't make sense, then the net is not a public place, but a glass pane asking for us to buy what is behind it. The fuck am I going to pay 49.99 to be at wallmart to ask for the movie behind the glass pane. paramount you suck.
But I do pay that much. 599.880000000 a year to have Internet. If I emailed someone once a day, that would be 1.62 dollars per mail. after 17.65 emails, it would have been the 29cents of postage that we pay today. Who the fuck wants to do that?? send 18 pieces of mail every single fucking day through he post office. They would travel for days before getting where my email version would get in less than a second.
It is clear that we Internet Fucks are not here for the fucking email. Cox, 49.99 is for entertainment. We want to talk to friends, email them, chat with them, listen through IP phony apps and radio stations on the net. We want the information on the net to be free. If you Paramount don't want that, and instead want me to pay for the movie, you got to make the internet private rather than public. If the net was yours, and I was on it for free then the 49.99 would go to pay for individual pieces of entertainment.
But the net is not free to get on, so get your fucking movies off of it. If you can control where your movies go, that means you own every copy. If you don't, that means they are up for grabs. Don't come to me asking me to "unsee" a movie, I just can't do that. I hope I have the right to remember a song in my head, because if not, then I would be infringing copy rights. We are after all computer programs our selves. Very complicated ones probably. But that doesn't make me able to "unsee" a movie I saw. If I find it on the net, its is mine unless you can protect it. If your movie is in a store, behind a glass, that means it is illegal for me to break the window and run away with it. I'm not hacking on to computers, I'm getting stuff from the floor. Stuff on the street is free as it is stuff on the net. Anything your computer can freely get to is yours to take. If that doesn't make sense, then the net is not a public place, but a glass pane asking for us to buy what is behind it. The fuck am I going to pay 49.99 to be at wallmart to ask for the movie behind the glass pane. paramount you suck.
Defending my right to download
Defending my right to download what ever the fuck I want......
It is true that you can use your ears to hear anything you want for free. If you happen to be walking by the street and you hear a TV show, that is free. If you hear your comadre neighbor talking about how she killed her husband yesterday, that is also free.
It is also true that if you are walking down the street and see something with your eyes, like a picture of Jebus or Alak or Jud-ass or the face of a very pretty lady, that is free of charge. If you go to a Government facility and look at something like the wall or a piece of paper with some secret on it, it is also free.
The same for touching. If you find a rock on the street, you can keep it. If you find a set of keys a wallet or a pen drive, it is also free. It is on the stree and unless you want to find the owner and give the rock back, you can keep the thing. to the owner, it has been released in to the wild. It is no longer of his or her possession.
What I am writing right now needs no GPL gnu public license or copy right. I am not selling this and I actually want people to read and be angry at the same things "paramount pictures". I know that once I release this note to the public, there will be a thousand copies in several servers and people may even read it.
Give those things. If I was a movie studio, I would not let my multi million dollar film be put on a pen drive in the street. But If I did, and someone took it, then several things could happen. Two of those would be :1 the guy watches the movie and gives it to a friend or not depending on weather he liked it. :2 the guy was looking for a reel thingy and so he took the film off and made fire with it while he made something with the reel part of the movie. Ahh Pen Drive. Say the guy wanted linux on a USB disk and this drive was like 4 gigs.
If the guy had declared himself a "non-market" that means that Paramount would not be able to sell this item to him anyway. So if he saw and like or did not like the movie, has no grounds to apply a charge. Once it is on the street, paramount can kiss their money good bye.
Now, you would think that if I made movies and didn't want people to make copies of them and release them before they are on the theater, I would have lots of security on them. Encrypted Pen Drive for example. Of course, if the guy can un encrypt it, then that is it, he can watch the movie. There should be no retaliation. I would not be hurting your business since I declared my self a "non-market". Well if anyone is reading this, they would get the idea. Non marketness creates a hole in their strategy. I would not buy a new car, but if someone were to leave it in front of my house and have the title on my name along with the keys, I would take it. But if I declared my self a non-market to new cars, then the maker of the car did not loose a costumer. They lost man hours and material to make this vehicle that someone gave me free of charge. That someone probably would have paid for it anyway.
How is a car different than a movie. Cars are things you can touch. People work on every single one that comes out of the company. Imagine that the car companies could make one car and then duplicate it through some sort of portal. Then they could fire everyone whenever they pleased. Hey I'm the owner of dizzny, I can keep selling the same shit at least 6 billion times for about that much in dollars total. But imagine that suddenly some guy invented a replicator of his own. He bought a car of his own and made copies to give out for free to anyone. The auto makers would be truly pissed and start suing the guy. But this sort of thing, the intelligent recombination of matter is not possible and probably not even plausible. So the car makers are safe like that. china makes copies by hand and sells the parts and vehicles. Read that again, because it is true. But you know what? I don't care, would buy a "fake" if it was cheaper and did the same. Because a fake of a car part is some sort of retarded thing to say. Ford should make smaller more fuel efficient like everyone else instead of complaining about everyone else having it better.
The same thing does not apply to a movie. I don't think you should be free to copy a movie and then sell the copies. You could probably copy it and sell the one copy you bought. That would essentially be doing the same thing as downloading. You have a crave for a movie and you find a movie and you watch the movie. The movie studio gets its fare share. 15 bucks for a DVD! fuck that. 11 bucks for a theater showing? once in a while. I cannot copy the ambiance of a movie theater, but I can sure as hell copy a dvd and I can also machine a part for my car. In any case, the movie studio gets lots and lots of money. A lot more than it is needed to make another film. Can you say the same for a car. Can the auto makers make a profit on a car series even when there are cars on the street for free??? no probably no. So the movie studios are at an unfair advantage over other types of money making ventures.
But these people are essentially living off of the artists who make the movies. If the actors and technical people got together on vacation and made a movie, they would probably make a ton more copies by releasing it on the Internet. They would probably make the same amount of money by giving it out for free as advertising to see the film on theaters. Cut the fat out.
Then there is the time and the free movies. If there are no venues to see free things like this post because it is too difficult to do so, then there would be no post. I would give the finger to any blogging thing that was more difficult than sending an email. Same with movies, if you can't distribute a free movie, no one would see it.
What about time. Time is of the escense. my two fucking free days are mostly spent at home mostly on my computer. I don't generally like other people. But these two days are precious to me. I'm not going to a theater to watch a new movie, but I will find wasting them on the couch watching an old movie, well worth it.
my grammar is sure great. this is how you leave a work piece unfinis
It is true that you can use your ears to hear anything you want for free. If you happen to be walking by the street and you hear a TV show, that is free. If you hear your comadre neighbor talking about how she killed her husband yesterday, that is also free.
It is also true that if you are walking down the street and see something with your eyes, like a picture of Jebus or Alak or Jud-ass or the face of a very pretty lady, that is free of charge. If you go to a Government facility and look at something like the wall or a piece of paper with some secret on it, it is also free.
The same for touching. If you find a rock on the street, you can keep it. If you find a set of keys a wallet or a pen drive, it is also free. It is on the stree and unless you want to find the owner and give the rock back, you can keep the thing. to the owner, it has been released in to the wild. It is no longer of his or her possession.
What I am writing right now needs no GPL gnu public license or copy right. I am not selling this and I actually want people to read and be angry at the same things "paramount pictures". I know that once I release this note to the public, there will be a thousand copies in several servers and people may even read it.
Give those things. If I was a movie studio, I would not let my multi million dollar film be put on a pen drive in the street. But If I did, and someone took it, then several things could happen. Two of those would be :1 the guy watches the movie and gives it to a friend or not depending on weather he liked it. :2 the guy was looking for a reel thingy and so he took the film off and made fire with it while he made something with the reel part of the movie. Ahh Pen Drive. Say the guy wanted linux on a USB disk and this drive was like 4 gigs.
If the guy had declared himself a "non-market" that means that Paramount would not be able to sell this item to him anyway. So if he saw and like or did not like the movie, has no grounds to apply a charge. Once it is on the street, paramount can kiss their money good bye.
Now, you would think that if I made movies and didn't want people to make copies of them and release them before they are on the theater, I would have lots of security on them. Encrypted Pen Drive for example. Of course, if the guy can un encrypt it, then that is it, he can watch the movie. There should be no retaliation. I would not be hurting your business since I declared my self a "non-market". Well if anyone is reading this, they would get the idea. Non marketness creates a hole in their strategy. I would not buy a new car, but if someone were to leave it in front of my house and have the title on my name along with the keys, I would take it. But if I declared my self a non-market to new cars, then the maker of the car did not loose a costumer. They lost man hours and material to make this vehicle that someone gave me free of charge. That someone probably would have paid for it anyway.
How is a car different than a movie. Cars are things you can touch. People work on every single one that comes out of the company. Imagine that the car companies could make one car and then duplicate it through some sort of portal. Then they could fire everyone whenever they pleased. Hey I'm the owner of dizzny, I can keep selling the same shit at least 6 billion times for about that much in dollars total. But imagine that suddenly some guy invented a replicator of his own. He bought a car of his own and made copies to give out for free to anyone. The auto makers would be truly pissed and start suing the guy. But this sort of thing, the intelligent recombination of matter is not possible and probably not even plausible. So the car makers are safe like that. china makes copies by hand and sells the parts and vehicles. Read that again, because it is true. But you know what? I don't care, would buy a "fake" if it was cheaper and did the same. Because a fake of a car part is some sort of retarded thing to say. Ford should make smaller more fuel efficient like everyone else instead of complaining about everyone else having it better.
The same thing does not apply to a movie. I don't think you should be free to copy a movie and then sell the copies. You could probably copy it and sell the one copy you bought. That would essentially be doing the same thing as downloading. You have a crave for a movie and you find a movie and you watch the movie. The movie studio gets its fare share. 15 bucks for a DVD! fuck that. 11 bucks for a theater showing? once in a while. I cannot copy the ambiance of a movie theater, but I can sure as hell copy a dvd and I can also machine a part for my car. In any case, the movie studio gets lots and lots of money. A lot more than it is needed to make another film. Can you say the same for a car. Can the auto makers make a profit on a car series even when there are cars on the street for free??? no probably no. So the movie studios are at an unfair advantage over other types of money making ventures.
But these people are essentially living off of the artists who make the movies. If the actors and technical people got together on vacation and made a movie, they would probably make a ton more copies by releasing it on the Internet. They would probably make the same amount of money by giving it out for free as advertising to see the film on theaters. Cut the fat out.
Then there is the time and the free movies. If there are no venues to see free things like this post because it is too difficult to do so, then there would be no post. I would give the finger to any blogging thing that was more difficult than sending an email. Same with movies, if you can't distribute a free movie, no one would see it.
What about time. Time is of the escense. my two fucking free days are mostly spent at home mostly on my computer. I don't generally like other people. But these two days are precious to me. I'm not going to a theater to watch a new movie, but I will find wasting them on the couch watching an old movie, well worth it.
my grammar is sure great. this is how you leave a work piece unfinis
Movies to not download
The Machinist;
please add a movie you discovered from paramount or one that should not be downloaded because you got an email from the milenium whatever the fuck Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") from your ISP.
Cox Communications
Dear Sir or Madam:
BayTSP, Inc. ("BayTSP") swears under penalty of perjury that Paramount Pictures Corporation ("Paramount") has authorized BayTSP to act as its non-exclusive agent for copyright infringement notification.
This might scare you more. Like never being able to get a girlfriend again scary: Imagine something along the lines of:
Cox Communications
Dear Sir or Madam:
BayTSP, Inc. ("BayTSP") swears under penalty of perjury that ASSFyouSEEkayXXX Pictures Corporation ("Porns"r"us") has authorized BayTSP to act as its non-exclusive agent for copyright infringement notification. The following porn film was downloaded using your computer IP.
your address according to COX is:
3452 elm street
San Pedro MA 67391
your phone also according to COX is:
(567)342-3467
we know where your moma lives and will be there today showing her the porn you have been watching. If you want more porn, please pay for it like everyone else or walk to the porn store and buy some there. you currently ow us 24,000,000,000,000 in porn material that has been stolen from our porn making vaults of porno ville.
please add a movie you discovered from paramount or one that should not be downloaded because you got an email from the milenium whatever the fuck Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") from your ISP.
Cox Communications
Dear Sir or Madam:
BayTSP, Inc. ("BayTSP") swears under penalty of perjury that Paramount Pictures Corporation ("Paramount") has authorized BayTSP to act as its non-exclusive agent for copyright infringement notification.
This might scare you more. Like never being able to get a girlfriend again scary: Imagine something along the lines of:
Cox Communications
Dear Sir or Madam:
BayTSP, Inc. ("BayTSP") swears under penalty of perjury that ASSFyouSEEkayXXX Pictures Corporation ("Porns"r"us") has authorized BayTSP to act as its non-exclusive agent for copyright infringement notification. The following porn film was downloaded using your computer IP.
your address according to COX is:
3452 elm street
San Pedro MA 67391
your phone also according to COX is:
(567)342-3467
we know where your moma lives and will be there today showing her the porn you have been watching. If you want more porn, please pay for it like everyone else or walk to the porn store and buy some there. you currently ow us 24,000,000,000,000 in porn material that has been stolen from our porn making vaults of porno ville.
Movies to not download
I recently got an email from cox because some how my computer was downloading a copy right protected piece of junk, err movie. So Here I am starting a change to my blog by declaring war on ANY movie studio that hurts its costumers. I declare my self a non market. I will not buy from you Paramount. So to start protecting my peeps, I will let you guys know that the movie was "the machinist". I know, who would give a dam about a movie that never made it to the theater ads on TV? Paramount pics. Just to clear things up, I don't give a rat's ass about this movie, thus I am a non market for it and could not have sold it to me if it was free.
Declare your selves a non market. Why do I have to watch ads about your movie, if i don't care about it. If I did want to know, I would try to seek the movie info. There are search engines for that. Hopefully people going by this blog will care enough to post a movie they know should not be downloaded from any of the file sharing programs.
Declare your selves a non market. Why do I have to watch ads about your movie, if i don't care about it. If I did want to know, I would try to seek the movie info. There are search engines for that. Hopefully people going by this blog will care enough to post a movie they know should not be downloaded from any of the file sharing programs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)